TWO DIFFERENT RUBRIC IN ONE CASE EACH RUBRIC ANSWER IN ONE FILE ASSIGNMENT IN MEDICAL ETHICS Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education University of H

TWO DIFFERENT RUBRIC IN ONE CASE EACH RUBRIC ANSWER IN ONE FILE ASSIGNMENT IN MEDICAL ETHICS Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Education

University of Hail
College of Nursing

المملكة العربية السعودية
وزارة التعليم
جامـعـة حـائل
كلية التمريض

INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523)

WRITTEN INSTRUCTION

Case Written Assignment

1. Written Assignment: Ethical Position Paper
2. Written Assignment: Ethical Decision-Making Paper

Using the Assigned Case:

1. This assessment requires you to critically examine the case scenario you selected or assigned to
you and examine the different attributes and practices of the role of interdisciplinary
professional ethics.

2. Answer the questions found at the end of each case and you may use the guided questions in
the question no.3.a.

3. Format of Paper:
a. This assignment requires you to develop a formal essay style that includes a body and

conclusion. You need to use a formal introduction, body, and conclusion. Below is your
guided questions.

i. knowing the evidences of the case,
ii. recognize the ethical issues,

iii. how do the various principles of ethical will apply into the arguments,
iv. present and defend when you decide your judgement which determine the

ethically best option of your choice, and
v. what is your recommended course of action (Plan)

b. Your assignment should be written in APA style and prepared as follows:
i. Has a cover sheet with the Case title, Your Complete Name, Student ID Number

and the name of the teacher.
ii. Use font, such as Arial, Calibri or Times New Roman; minimum font size 12

iii. Use the APA style referencing. All in-text references must include page
numbers, which is a must. Use the link provided to learn how to cite sources:
https://www.citethisforme.com/ or any available site.

4. Check and compare with the Assessment Task Rubric of both Written Assignment (Ethical
Position Paper and Ethical Decision-Making Paper) on how you will be graded accordingly.

MY Case

https://www.citethisforme.com/

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Education

University of Hail
College of Nursing

المملكة العربية السعودية
وزارة التعليم
جامـعـة حـائل
كلية التمريض

INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523)

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Education

University of Hail
College of Nursing

المملكة العربية السعودية
وزارة التعليم
جامـعـة حـائل
كلية التمريض

INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523)

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Education

University of Hail
College of Nursing

المملكة العربية السعودية
وزارة التعليم
جامـعـة حـائل
كلية التمريض

INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523)
Rubric for Ethical Position Paper – Written Assignment

Page 4 of 10

Accredited University by the ASIC on
March 27, 2017

Accredited BSN Program by
AHPGS on February 15, 2018

Student Name:

Student ID:

Date:

Overall Grade:

Assessment Rubric:

ITEM POOR
(0.0)

ACCEPTABLE
(1.0)

IDEAL
(2.0)

CLO STUDENT’S
GRADE

1) Clarification
of the ethical
issue.

Did not clarify
the ethical
issue.

Partially
clarified the
ethical issue

Comprehensively
clarified the ethical
issue

1.1

2) Re-framing
of the ethical
issue as an
ethical
question.

Failed to re-
frame the
ethical issue
into an ethical
question.

Re-framed the
ethical issue
into a vague
ethical
question.

Re-framed the
ethical issue into a
clear and well-
defined ethical
question.

1.1

3) Utilization of
practice and/or
research based
literature to
explore
different
perspectives
on the issue.

Did not utilize
practice and/or
research based
literature to
explore
different
perspectives
on the issue.

Utilized either
practice or
research based
literature to
explore
different
perspectives
on the issue.

Utilized both
practice and
research based
literature to explore
different
perspectives on the
issue.

1.2 and 1.3

4) Articulation
of position on
the issue on
the basis of
personal
values.

Failed to
articulate
position on the
issue based on
any personal
values.

Articulated
position on the
issue based on
a single
personal value.

Articulated position
on the issue based
on at least two
personal values.

1.2

5) Referencing
of personal
value position
to relevant
ethical

Did not
reference
personal value
position to any
relevant
ethical

Referenced
personal value
position to a
single relevant
ethical

Referenced
personal value
position to at least
two relevant ethical
principles or codes.

1.2

Assessment Task Assessment Score
□ Rubric for Ethical Position Paper – Written Assignment 20%

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Education

University of Hail
College of Nursing

المملكة العربية السعودية
وزارة التعليم
جامـعـة حـائل
كلية التمريض

INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523)
Rubric for Ethical Position Paper – Written Assignment

Page 5 of 10

Accredited University by the ASIC on
March 27, 2017

Accredited BSN Program by
AHPGS on February 15, 2018

principles of
codes.

principle or
code.

principle or
code.

6) Articulation
of position on
the issue on
the basis of
professional
values.

Failed to
articulate
position on the
issue based on
any
professional
values.

Articulated
position on the
issue based on
a single
professional
value.

Articulated position
on the issue based
on at least two
professional values.

1.3

7) Referencing
of professional
position to
relevant
ethical
principles of
codes.

Did not
reference
personal value
position to any
relevant
ethical
principle or
code.

Referenced
personal value
position to a
single relevant
ethical
principle or
code.

Referenced
personal value
position to at least
two relevant ethical
principles or codes.

1.3

8) Discussion of
potential
challenges for
practice.

Failed to
discuss any
potential
challenges for
practice.

Discussed a
single potential
challenge for
practice.

Discussed at least
two potential
challenges for
practice.

2.2

9) Composition
of a well-
structured, and
grammatically
correct ethical
position paper.

Composed a
poorly
structured
ethical position
paper with
numerous
grammatical
errors.

Composed a
fairly-
structured
ethical position
paper with
some
grammatical
errors.

Composed a well-
structured ethical
position paper free
of grammatical
errors.

Not applicable

10) Reference
List

Provided up to
five (5)
references for
the ethical
position paper
assignment.

Provided from
six (6) to ten
(10) references
for the ethical
position paper
assignment.

Provided more than
ten (10) references
for the ethical
position paper
assignment.

Not applicable

TOTAL GRADE FROM A PERFECT SCORE OF 20

Evaluator’s Name: ________________________________

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Education

University of Hail
College of Nursing

المملكة العربية السعودية
وزارة التعليم
جامـعـة حـائل
كلية التمريض

INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523)
Rubric for Ethical Position Paper – Written Assignment

Page 6 of 10

Accredited University by the ASIC on
March 27, 2017

Accredited BSN Program by
AHPGS on February 15, 2018

Evaluator’s Signature: _______________________________

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Education

University of Hail
College of Nursing

المملكة العربية السعودية
وزارة التعليم
جامـعـة حـائل
كلية التمريض

INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523)
Rubric for Ethical Decision-making Paper – Written Assignment

Page 7 of 10

Accredited University by the ASIC on
March 27, 2017

Accredited BSN Program by
AHPGS on February 15, 2018

Student Name:

Student ID:

Date:

Overall Grade:

Assessment Rubric:

ITEM POOR
(0)

ACCEPTABLE
(0.5)

IDEAL
(1)

CLO STUDENT’S
GRADE

1)
Distinguishing
the position of
the
protagonist
(main
character) in
the scenario.

Did not
distinguish the
position of the
protagonist
(main
character in
the scenario).

Partially
distinguished
the position of
the protagonist
(main
character in
the scenario).

Comprehensively
distinguished the
position of the
protagonist (main
character in the
scenario).

1.1

2)
Identification
of the ethical
dimensions of
the presenting
case with
respect to the
protagonist
(main
character) in
the scenario.

Failed to
identify any of
the ethical
dimensions of
the presenting
case with
respect to the
protagonist
(main
character) in
the scenario

Identified
some of the
ethical
dimensions of
the presenting
case with
respect to the
protagonist
(main
character) in
the scenario.

Completely
identified all of the
ethical dimensions
of the presenting
case with respect to
the protagonist
(main character) in
the scenario.

1.1

3)
Identification
of the
competing
professional
principles and
values with
respect to the

Did not identify
the competing
professional
principles and
values with
respect to the
protagonist
(main

Partially
identified some
of the
competing
professional
principles and
values with
respect to the

Thoroughly
identified all of the
competing
professional
principles and values
with respect to the
protagonist (main

1.2, 1.3

Assessment Task Assessment Score


Rubric for Ethical Decision-making Paper – Written
Assignment

10%

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Education

University of Hail
College of Nursing

المملكة العربية السعودية
وزارة التعليم
جامـعـة حـائل
كلية التمريض

INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523)
Rubric for Ethical Decision-making Paper – Written Assignment

Page 8 of 10

Accredited University by the ASIC on
March 27, 2017

Accredited BSN Program by
AHPGS on February 15, 2018

protagonist
(main
character) in
the scenario.

character) in
the scenario.

protagonist
(main
character) in
the scenario.

character) in the
scenario.

4)
Distinguishing
the position of
at least one
other
professional in
the scenario.

Failed to
distinguish the
position of at
least one other
professional in
the scenario.

Partially
distinguished
the position of
at least one
other
professional in
the scenario.

Comprehensively
distinguished the
position of the at
least one other
professional in the
scenario.

1.1

5) Analysis of
the similarities
and/or
differences in
the ethical
principles
which the
other
professional in
the scenario
would consider
compared with
the
protagonist
(main
character).

Provided no
analysis of the
similarities
and/or
differences in
the ethical
principles
which the
other
professional in
the scenario
would consider
compared with
the protagonist
(main
character).

Provided an
analysis of
either just the
similarities or
just the
differences in
the ethical
principles
which the
other
professional in
the scenario
would consider
compared with
the protagonist
(main
character).

Provided an analysis
of both the
similarities and
differences in the
ethical principles
which the other
professional in the
scenario would
consider compared
with the protagonist
(main character).

2.1

6) Utilization of
a clearly
identified
ethical
decision-
making model
to
systematically
explore the
presenting
situation.

Did not utilize a
clearly
identified
ethical
decision-
making model
to
systematically
explore the
presenting
situation.

Partially
utilized a
clearly
identified
ethical
decision-
making model
to
systematically
explore the
presenting
situation.

Completely utilized a
clearly identified
ethical decision-
making model to
systematically
explore the
presenting situation.

2.3

7) Highlighting
relevant steps

Failed to
highlight the

Highlighted
some of the

Highlighted all of the
relevant steps of the

2.3

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Education

University of Hail
College of Nursing

المملكة العربية السعودية
وزارة التعليم
جامـعـة حـائل
كلية التمريض

INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523)
Rubric for Ethical Decision-making Paper – Written Assignment

Page 9 of 10

Accredited University by the ASIC on
March 27, 2017

Accredited BSN Program by
AHPGS on February 15, 2018

of the process
involved in the
identified
ethical
decision-
making model
utilized to
systematically
explore the
presenting
situation.

relevant steps
of the process
involved in the
identified
ethical
decision-
making model
utilized to
systematically
explore the
presenting
situation.

relevant steps
of the process
involved in the
identified
ethical decision
making model
utilized to
systematically
explore the
presenting
situation.

process involved in
the identified ethical
decision-making
model utilized to
systematically
explore the
presenting situation.

8) Formulation
of a justified
final position
consistent with
professional
practice

Did not
formulate a
justified final
position
consistent with
professional
practice.

Formulated a
partially
justified final
position
consistent with
professional
practice.

Formulated a
comprehensively
justified final
position consistent
with professional
practice.

2.3

9) Composition
of a well-
structured, and
grammatically
correct ethical
decision-
making paper.

Composed a
poorly
structured
ethical
decision-
making paper
with numerous
grammatical
errors.

Composed a
fairly-
structured
ethical
decision-
making paper
with some
grammatical
errors.

Composed a well-
structured ethical
decision-making
paper free of
grammatical errors.

Not
applicable

10) Reference
List

Provided an
insufficient
number of
references for
the ethical
decision-
making paper
assignment.

Provided a
reasonably
sufficient
number of
references for
the ethical
decision-
making paper
assignment.

Provided an
extensive number of
references for the
ethical decision-
making paper
assignment.

Not
applicable

TOTAL GRADE FROM A PERFECT SCORE OF 10

Evaluator’s Name: ________________________________

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Education

University of Hail
College of Nursing

المملكة العربية السعودية
وزارة التعليم
جامـعـة حـائل
كلية التمريض

INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523)
Rubric for Ethical Decision-making Paper – Written Assignment

Page 10 of 10

Accredited University by the ASIC on
March 27, 2017

Accredited BSN Program by
AHPGS on February 15, 2018

Evaluator’s Signature: _______________________________

Looking for this or a Similar Assignment? Click below to Place your Order